By John D. Stoll
DETROIT -- The government agency that protects pensions for Americans is
raising fresh concerns about the repercussions if one or more of the U.S. auto
makers were to collapse, saying 1.3 million workers and retirees could see their
pensions slashed if that were to happen.
The head of the U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. acknowledged in an
interview that General Motors Corp.,
Ford Motor Co., and Chrysler LLC have well funded pensions according to the
standard accounting rules applied by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
But by the PBGC's measures, the pension funds of Detroit's Big Three would be
underfunded by as much as $41 billion if one or more of the auto makers went
under and killed their pension plans, PBGC Director Charles E. F. Millard
said.
"An awful lot of people seem to think these plans are well funded or
overfunded," Mr. Millard said in an interview. "Each of these plans is
significantly underfunded [and] in three years I don't want people coming back
and saying, 'How come the PBGC never told us that?'"
This concern adds fodder to an ongoing debate over what the government's role
should be in helping the struggling auto makers from collapsing as the trio face
a difficult road in 2009. Some people argue a bailout for Detroit would be a
good use of taxpayer money, and that holding back financial aid would result in
a collapse, and force the government to spend billions shoring up the companies
pension plans.
Mr. Millard estimates that the three auto makers only have enough money in
their pension funds to cover only 76% of the pension obligations they have made,
if they terminate the pension plans. GM's plan is estimated to be $20 billion,
or about 20% underfunded, while Chrysler's plan is 34% underfunded, leading to a
$9 billion-plus shortfall, the agency said. Ford's funded ratio is not publicly
available, but the company's pension plans are likely running at a $12 billion
deficit.
About $13 billion of the estimated $41 billion shortfall would be covered by
the PBGC, Jeffrey Speicher, an agency spokesman, said. The remainder represents
benefits that PBGC could not pay because of limits set by Congress, and those
benefits would be lost by employees and retirees.
If all three companies were to terminate their plans, the PBGC's current
deficit would double, as would the number of people receive pensions from the
agency.
GM spokeswoman Julie Gibson said the auto maker is in compliance with pension
accounting, its pension are adequately funded and it doesn't have any near-term
funding obligations. The company could make more contributions to its pension
plans in coming years, but it also holds various credits with the Internal
Revenue Service that could help fund the pension plans . The auto maker will
report an update on its pension status when it releases annual report filing in
coming months.
When GM last gave a year-end update on its pension funds, the funds covered
more than 400,000 retirees and were overfunded by $18.8 billion. But in
November, GM said its plan for hourly workers was underfunded by $500 million
because of restructuring expenses. Its plan for salaried employees remains
overfunded by at least $500 million. GM, like its rivals, have relied on the
pension funds to help cushion its restructuring costs, and that has contributed
to a quick deterioration in the health of the funds.
"In regards to our pension plans, we take our obligations very seriously,
managing our plans with integrity and prudence even during difficult times,"
Ford spokesman Bill Collins said. The auto maker's most-recent numbers suggest
its U.S. plans 103% funded, or carrying a $1.3 billion surplus with $45.8
billion in plan.
Mr. Collins said Ford will update its funding status when it releases its
annual report.
A Chrysler spokeswoman did not return phone calls.
The PBGC steps in to take over failed pension plans, and protects the
retirement savings of almost 44 million Americans. Because it is charged with
insuring pensions in the event that a business or organization terminates
pension plans, the PBGC monitors not only the SEC's accounting requirements, but
also attempts to estimate how well-funded the plans would be if they were
terminated in a liquidation or some other restructuring.
In recent months, as the cash reserves of GM, Ford and Chrysler have been
drained due to slow auto sales and heavy restructuring obligations, concerns
over the viability of these auto makers has skyrocketed.
The White House last month issued a $17.4 billion loan package to GM and
Chrysler, but that money is only expected to last until the end of March. At
that point, if the two car companies can prove they are on the path to
sustainability, they may be able to successfully argue for more funding or be
able to tell the government that they have stabilized to the point where they
don't need government funding.
Write to John D. Stoll at john.stoll@wsj.com
Copyright 2008 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved